Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

  • I shouldn’t have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.

  • We shouldn’t have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that’s blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

  • FancyGUI@lemmy.fancywhale.caEnglish
    9·
    1 year ago

    all built off of decades of research and a lot of the specific advancements recently happen to be fairly small innovations into previous research infused with a crapload of cash and hype>

    That’s exactly what I mean! The research projects I’ve been 5-7 years ago had already created LLMs like this that were as impressive as GPT. I don’t mean that the things that are going one aren’t impressive, I just mean that there’s nothing actually new. That’s all. IT’s similar to the previous hype wave that happened in AI with machine learning models when google was pushing deep learning. I really just want to point that out.