Extreme poverty in particular is a far less objective or meaningful measurement than you would think given how often the “everything is fine” crowd likes to cite it. The daily income defined as “extreme poverty” is abysmally low; $2 USD per day wouldn’t be enough to get basic necessities for food and shelter, and while its terrifying to think about having to live on even less we shouldn’t congratulate ourselves when the bar is just barely above the lowest levels of hell. Different poverty lines show different trends and by standards that would allow a person to live decently rather than merely avoiding the absolute worst deprivations we actually see very little change. And that’s before getting into the way poverty is distributed globally and the ways that even with the lowest poverty lines we see a lot of the poorest of the poor who have seen far less of a shift.
you’re pushing the “But on the other hand most hard quality of life indicators are up globally” line but like, the number of negative things you’ve listed is more than the positives.
I mean, it’s almost as if you are manipulating yourself into questioning and rejecting reality*. You should stop doing that
*there is no one word description for this action. Believe me, I looked, and I’d use it if it existed.
I feel like you’re just going offtopic here. I mean, poverty around the world may be down for reasons that have nothing to do with what Silicon Valley is peddling; the article specifically criticizes the latter’s particular “tech utopia” vision of the future and not what was written up in the UN Millennium Development Goals.
deleted by creator
The planet is slowly cooking but the GDP line goes up 🤷
“People say their life sucks, but I looked at some numbers and actually they’re wrong!”
stop gaslighting yourself
What’s a hard quality of life indicator?
deleted by creator
Extreme poverty in particular is a far less objective or meaningful measurement than you would think given how often the “everything is fine” crowd likes to cite it. The daily income defined as “extreme poverty” is abysmally low; $2 USD per day wouldn’t be enough to get basic necessities for food and shelter, and while its terrifying to think about having to live on even less we shouldn’t congratulate ourselves when the bar is just barely above the lowest levels of hell. Different poverty lines show different trends and by standards that would allow a person to live decently rather than merely avoiding the absolute worst deprivations we actually see very little change. And that’s before getting into the way poverty is distributed globally and the ways that even with the lowest poverty lines we see a lot of the poorest of the poor who have seen far less of a shift.
deleted by creator
you’re pushing the “But on the other hand most hard quality of life indicators are up globally” line but like, the number of negative things you’ve listed is more than the positives.
I mean, it’s almost as if you are manipulating yourself into questioning and rejecting reality*. You should stop doing that
*there is no one word description for this action. Believe me, I looked, and I’d use it if it existed.
deleted by creator
I don’t know shit about these stats, and everything can be debated, but just wanted to say: don’t let people get you down.
Feeling positive/hopeful isn’t always appropriate about everything, but people in here are acting like it’s a mental illness.
deleted by creator
mods that’s pinker’s 17th alt
I feel like you’re just going offtopic here. I mean, poverty around the world may be down for reasons that have nothing to do with what Silicon Valley is peddling; the article specifically criticizes the latter’s particular “tech utopia” vision of the future and not what was written up in the UN Millennium Development Goals.
deleted by creator