• freeze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    People who are so concerned about that possibility can just require their prospective spouse to sign a prenup with conditions like that on alimony, as a condition of getting married.

    • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yup, that’s a great way to start a marriage. “I love you with all my heart and want to be with you forever. Also, I don’t trust you, so let’s get a prenup.”

      The law needs to protect people by default. It’s just impractical not to. You have to keep in mind that humans are not perfect rational agents.

      • freeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        If someone has this strong of a concern about potentially having to pay alimony in the future and their partner is this bothered by practical attempts to alleviate that fear by preventing an issue, then maybe they’re just not right for each other and shouldn’t get married.

        Alimony laws also vary enormously by jurisdiction, and people could also just e.g. not marry someone who doesn’t work or isn’t planning to. Or only marry someone who gets paid close enough to the same amount that alimony likely wouldn’t come into play regardless.

          • freeze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I think I have a realistic view. Usually terminally online men don’t understand how alimony even works or how rare it is in the first place. I suppose they just get off on these kinds of justice porn theoretical outrage scenarios.