- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
Summary
X, owned by Elon Musk, is suing to block California’s AB 2655, a law requiring social media platforms to remove “materially deceptive content” like deepfakes about politicians within 120 days of an election.
The lawsuit argues the law violates the First Amendment and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, claiming it would lead to broad censorship of political speech to avoid enforcement costs.
A similar California law, AB 2839, was blocked last month for overreaching into constitutionally protected speech, including parody and satire.
AB 2655 is set to take effect in 2024.
Tweak algorithms to limit reach of new accounts, don’t allow russians to buy ads or blue checkmarks, have a team of moderators that moderate based on known bad images, known bad IP addresses, known bad account creation patterns. If non-profit researchers are able to uncover botnets, there’s no reason why billion dollar companies can’t. It’s a cat and mouse game, but it’s not acceptable for these companies to put in 0 effort. These companies are better funded than the Internet Research Agency.
How would you rate the odds of all those things happening in order for your scenario to come true?
100% if you fine them 6% of their global revenue for refusing safety recommendations by the EU and independent auditors
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/dsa-enforcement
There’s a reason why Elon Musk is running to Trump for help after the EU started suing him for breaking this law.
https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-elon-musk-x-tech-social-media-politics-elections-eu/
If Trump can’t dodge EU disinformation laws, no one can.
I hope you’re right.