• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ciswomen were having sex?

    Then wait, why are there so many incels?

    Joking aside, there actually have been times when I’ve been at a social event and I’m gonna fuck a guy because why not… but he starts going off on incel bullshit and how far right he is because “Women aren’t women” anymore, and I’m like… “Yeah I gotta go…” while thinking “Can’t believe he talked his way OUT of a sure thing.”

    So I fully understand why there are so many incels.

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I mean, considering how many incels voted for trump, I think we’re pretty much already there. Many of the young men who voted red this election already have no close relationships with any women their age. Obviously women should exercise their autonomy as they see fit. I don’t expect it to change how anyone votes.

    I’ll probably be downvoted for this, but progressives have spent the last several years actively shutting down lines of communication with men, particularly white men. For the best of reasons, sure, but it hasn’t been an effective strategy for winning elections.

    Maybe this would sway some group of center-left men who didn’t bother voting, but realistically I expect it will have no effect on the ongoing polarization, or exagerrate it.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Everyone in here arguing against 4b need to take a look in the mirror. The fact that so many of you are trying push against it is in itself a demonstration of why it’s necessary. Respecting bodily autonomy does not have to be hard.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Bodily autonomy is the ability to choose 4b, not the reason to do so. Folks arguing against 4b have not disrespected the ability to do 4b. Therefore bodily autonomy is still respected.

        • Ponchy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          7 days ago

          “It’s over internet commenter! I have portrayed you negatively in a meme, showing you as the naive you are”

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes, posting a message on the internet while violating nobody’s personal space or rights is exactly the same as that picture. You did it! You won the internet! You can go away now.

          Go away

          Now

          • JCPhoenix@beehaw.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            FYI, you’re on Beehaw. Please be(e) nice. I know it’s crazy times right now, I get it, but we do want folks to still abide by our rules and such here. Thanks.

            • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 days ago

              While it took several minutes to find your rules, your “spirit of the rules” document specifically identifies what I did as positive: regardless of the other user fake following the rules the spirit of their post was extremely negative and portrayed the other commenter in a false rude light, which I immediately called him out on and asked him to leave. This is a paradox of intolerance situation and you seem to be on the side of intolerance which I’m not a fan of since your bee nice philosophy appears to be explicitly against it.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Cute (I actually laughed, haha), but the assumption that meme makes is that it’s clear the gal doesn’t want to participate in the conversation due to body language.

          There’s none of that when you’re commenting in a public politics community. You’re not posting in a community for 4b, for example. Additionally, you’re the one that made the initial comment.

          By attempting to talk over and belittle others who respond you’re acting like the guy in the meme.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            that meme makes is that it’s clear the gal doesn’t want to participate in the conversation due to body language.

            Not trying to argue against the meme, how it’s used and understood etc, but: You can’t interpret body language from a still image, you need at least like two or three movements, you need to see how someone reacts to their own movements so to speak. She might just as well be going “woah, cool”, slight backward surprise movement, and the two are the most wholesome couple you’ve ever met. Or she actually really wants to get out of there. That’s the point: The still image itself is too little information to make the distinction.

  • InevitableList@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s interesting that the response to men going their own way (MGTOW) is indifference or at most pity whilst WGTOW are met with hostility.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Mgtow was not met with indifference. They’ve been consistently criticized since the movement first started, and they quickly evolved into a cabal of Nazi-adjacent freaks. Fuck those guys.

      There may be some good that could come from a men’s movement for self actualization and improvement, but mgtow sure as shit wasn’t that

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      MGTOW should be indifferent, but they kinda got hijacked into another red pill BS place. Their lives revolve around hate for women and not actually going your own way and finding what makes you content.

    • femtech@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not more kids by total but more kids by %. But it won’t be enough to keep the old people and economy in its current state alive.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Is a future dominated by kids raised by these families one worth going through all this effort for?

        As I mentioned in another comment, one of the conservatives I know put their kid in a captain America outfit yesterday cuz he was “defending America”.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                The system which is made up of a bunch of kids raised in brainwashed conservative households.

                I feel like this is, in part, voluntarily abstaining from passing your values down to the next generation, which night not have the intended effect.

                • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  And part of me feels it would be well earned, right? Not the best part of me.

                  I’ve been seriously struggling with the idea that the changes that are about to come are going to destroy what chances we had left to recover this world from the damage our species has done.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      By percentage, but the total birthrate would (continue to) go down.

      And now Trump’s gonna make it harder to immigrate, so the population may actually start nosediving.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, others have portrayed that as the goal here.

        I just feel like I wouldn’t feel particularly attached to the fate of a country raised by brainwashing conservative families anyways, so it’s a scorched earth approach. Yes, you’ve broken the system, and it can be remade now, but those doing the remaking likely won’t carry your values…

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Maybe we need to adopt. Obviously the cost of this is pretty huge, but it could maybe work. Just a thought.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wouldn’t this just create even more conservatives if they are the only ones having children? Seems counterintuitive.

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      it’s also a quite terf movement. It basically mirrors MGTOW. I don’t think people should follow them.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    So, creating a massive headache for government ~15-20 years into the future?

    Or what is the point?

  • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    i highly doubt women will just stop having sex. its as dumb as asking men to stop jerking off. just never gonna happen

    • Take_your_zync@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      When the choice is a man thinking of you as property to control or a vibrator/custom sized dildo, idk why you think it’s even a contest.

      • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        your comment makes it sound like women are incapable of having sex with men simply because they enjoy sex with men

        it would be like me turning down a handjob because ive been doing it myself for years

        • Zement@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Reducing it to the core,… yes a few hate fucks could still occur. But a relationship with a misogynist is only possible with psychological disorders on the women’s side. (Mostly Self loathing, no self esteem != woke women who have self esteem).

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Read Lysistrata and good luck to you.

    When the system becomes too odious, non-participation is one way of dealing with it.

  • Alienmonkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The no marriage part is interesting, the rest carries more unintended collateral.

    As a movement, removing the institutional component would affect the wider group, and their wallets.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nobody should be forced into relationships and customs that don’t suit them. It’s up to them to decide if the downsides are excessive or a price worth paying.