• 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If you think it hasn’t happend before, check again, nothing in history is new

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      When have we had AI so good the turing test lost it’s whole meaning overnight?

      • basmati@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The mechanical turk. Like the mechanical turk LLMs have the same flaw, it’s really just a human behind the best implementations.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’ve checked my PC looking for the tiny man managing my local llm, no luck yet but perhaps they’re smaller than I thought…

          • basmati@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s nice dear, the amount of human hours tuning your model to not be complete gibberish definitely don’t count, and the fact all live service LLMs employ at least a few dozen third world workers to check results and change outputs disagree with your under powered rng.

            • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              34 minutes ago

              They sure put a ton of money into sweeping it under the rug that exploiting workers at near-slavery wages is always what makes these “technological revolutionary marvels” actually tick.

              Whether it’s new FoxConn chips, EV batteries, “free shipping”, or LLMs.

              Every. Time.