• brian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would imagine the blanket statute to refer to is something like reckless endangerment, or perhaps more likely would be the firearms themselves being unlicensed.

      Additionally, if I shot at someone who was wearing a bulletproof vest, it still would be attempted murder. If they asked me to shoot at them, it still would continue to be attempted murder (“no judge, they asked me to shoot them and I missed”).

      I mean, even if someone explicitly asked for you to kill them, in writing, notarized, and all that legal jazz, then you’re getting into the realm of assisted suicide and that lovely grey area of morality. Though I believe it’s still illegal throughout the US.

    • FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Reminds me of that YouTuber that convinced his pregnant partner to shoot him with a desert eagle while holding an encyclopedia in front of his chest. He died, she was sentenced to 180 days for manslaughter

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Did the bullet penetrate the book and still have enough momentum to penetrate his sternum, or did he die from the force of impact? That’s the thing about bulletproof vests too. Sure, they may stop the bullet, but it’s still going to fuck you up.

        • FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It went through the book. I don’t know if a bullet proof vest can stop a 50 cal fired from a foot away either tbh, but definitely like you’re saying it won’t prevent injury

    • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Especially in the US?? It’s not like they won’t be paying for their own healthcare lmao

    • sus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      well “arrested” doesn’t actually mean it’s illegal, it just means the cops thought they likely did something illegal

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What do I care if a couple of idiots want to shoot each other while wearing bulletproof vests? The government would almost certainly allow it if they applied for a bunch of special permits and shit. This basically comes down to your philosophy, does the government grant rights, or do you inherently have rights, and only things that harm other people without their consent should be illegal.