• figaro@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      As God, I temporarily relieve the souls who are currently in a rush from the consequences of failing the shopping cart test. They will be tested again, however, using seemingly innocuous daily items to prove if they belong in the good place.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Theres lots of reasons someone might feel or be incapable of following all of the social norms. Good and bad reasons. Since we can’t know which is which at a glance its best to withhold judgment.

        Although some cases are like 99% sure and you can totally judge their pants off all you want.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I feel like this was chosen specifically because it’s one of those cases where it’s easy to tell.

          For instance, there was a Walmart next to a bus stop I used to take. People had to take their groceries to the bus, but Walmart didn’t put a shopping cart corral within like 200 meters of it. I don’t really blame people too harshly for leaving their carts there, if they’re taking a big load of groceries on the bus.

          Fwiw it’s not that it’s a social norm that is important, it’s it’s natural as a social good, and it’s nature as something (typically) trivial to do.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Its neither a good or bad. It could be argued either way, which makes it a matter of opinion.

            You even have cart returners here in this thread arguing to not return them in some cases.

            The real answer is that whether you put a cart back or not says nothing about someone’s character.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s absolutely a good.

              The only “cart returner” I saw against it basically just claimed that the people in their town/state/country were too incompetent to operate shopping carts (even if that’s not what they explicitly said) so idk if i really trust them or want to use that as a measure.

              Making work for others to save yourself some trivial amount of work absolutely says something about your character

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                I’m saying it doesnt rise to the level of determining if someone is a good or bad person. Besides the fact that noone is good or bad.

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Let me put it another way:
                  They fail the vibe check
                  It’s a red flag

                  Bad vibes and red flags don’t mean for sure someone is a bad person, they’re a call to be alert and suspicious.

                  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    That only applies if its someone in your social circle. You can follow up with them and ask why, learn about their struggles or stance on it.

                    With strangers you have none of that, just little glimpses into their life for a few seconds as they cross yours. When we are out in public it is very important to make quick judgments for safety, but this often is confused with moral judgment.

                    There are very few people in each persons social circle that they know well enough to judge morally. Strangers aren’t close enough by a long shot.

                    With all this considered, I have to conclude its best to always give strangers the benefit of the doubt when personal safety isnt involved.

                    I’m concerned this post is showing people are coming to the opposite conclusion, that we now have this great new way to judge strangers we shouldnt be judging to begin with.