Oklahoma’s education board has revoked the license of a former teacher who drew national attention during surging book-ban efforts across the U.S. in 2022 when she covered part of her classroom bookshelf in red tape with the words “Books the state didn’t want you to read.”

The decision Thursday went against a judge who had advised the Oklahoma Board of Education not to revoke the license of Summer Boismier, who had also put in her high school classroom a QR code of the Brooklyn Public Library’s catalogue of banned books.

An attorney for Boismier, who now works at the Brooklyn Public Library in New York City, told reporters after the board meeting that they would seek to overturn the decision.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    Do you think its a feedback loop that states with the worst test scores make the worst decisions about education?

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 months ago

      A designed loop until they can make the whole thing implode and eliminate public education. Goal is to then drive to religious schools with vouchers that cost more and more work time and importantly to keep woman in the home, not working, and persistently pregnant.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They think they can force the '50s on America? They realize with house prices there’s no magical white collar job Howard Cunningham can get that will provide enough for a house and allow Miriam to stay home and care for Ritchie and Joanie, right? Even if Miriam has no education and there’s no choice, it’s not enough to support 4 people and a house.

        Even beyond the textbook cruelty of subjugating one person under another based on sex like it’s Afghanistan, limiting education so they’re pliable and dehumanized and dependent, the fact remains: it’s impossible financially to re-create the McCarthy era no matter how much they really really want it in their twisted, poisoned hearts.

        For so, oh so many reasons, we’re not going back.

        • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah so these people are going to be perpetually in increasing amounts of debt, spending less of their little money on themselves, both being a profit center and reducing their choice to opt out.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        In this scenario, how does the ruling class maintain their numbers? Do they send their kids to private schools where the actual education occurs? Or they haven’t thought that far ahead yet?

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Do they send their kids to private schools where the actual education occurs?

          Yes. That’s what they’ve been doing for well over a century. It’s also one of the greatest arguments for banning and criminalizing private educational institutions. Forcing the wealthy to use the same schools also forces them to not destroy it.

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have met some rentier class people (massive wealth from charging for their massive assets), and their kids went to expensive private schools. The scenario is not hypothetical.

          Kidnapping is a real fear at that level of remove from the ‘Great Unwashed.’

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      No because the same fuckers have been in power for the last 70 years. They’re the ones that started the changes.