Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 days agoInnocentlemmy.worldimagemessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down166
arrow-up1-56arrow-down1imageInnocentlemmy.worldLinkerbaan@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 days agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareSanctus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·28 days agoI usually agree with you, Linker. But definitely not here. Lobbying and AIPAC money are the crux of this situation. If it were still illegal bribery, like it actually is in reality, the denial would not be existent.
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·28 days agoSo why do you think Biden dropped out?
minus-squareSanctus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·28 days agoThat is a rare case of listening to constituents. You are right. Usually, they listen to donors over voters.
minus-squareLinkerbaan@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·28 days agoIt’s not a rare case they had no choice. Biden was a guaranteed loss. Losing just 5% of voters makes enough of a difference for the Democrats to change policy. They listen to their donors, but in the end they cannot do that if they don’t get enough votes to get in power.
I usually agree with you, Linker. But definitely not here. Lobbying and AIPAC money are the crux of this situation. If it were still illegal bribery, like it actually is in reality, the denial would not be existent.
So why do you think Biden dropped out?
That is a rare case of listening to constituents. You are right. Usually, they listen to donors over voters.
It’s not a rare case they had no choice. Biden was a guaranteed loss.
Losing just 5% of voters makes enough of a difference for the Democrats to change policy.
They listen to their donors, but in the end they cannot do that if they don’t get enough votes to get in power.