• bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Under modern food production systems that are entirely for profit we have had less famine in the world than any prior generation and especially far less famine in the world than in any communist nation that has tried to go and produce food without profit motives.

    Ideas like this one will lead far more people to starve.

    • jbrains@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @bioemerl Many many more people who would otherwise starve no longer starve. Many many more people who would otherwise have access to nutritional food are now surrounded by food that makes them sick.

      I hope we can agree that both are true and there are ways to do better.

      We failed with no profit motive and we failed by maximizing profit motive. I don’t think this idea would cause any more people to starve. I worry about our ongoing, collective failures of imagination.

      No, I don’t know how to solve the problem.

      • bioemerl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I don’t know how to solve the problem.

        It’s really not hard, You just push for regulations. Problem is, people like their junk food so they are almost always against regulations against it.

        We are a democracy at the end of the day and taking away people’s favorite foods is going to cause politicians to get voted out of office, even if it’s better for them.

    • Cornerspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re spot on. Furthermore, under socialism/communism countless millions have starved to death due to governmental incompetence. The op has obviously never studied history.