• rjs001@lemmygrad.mldeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t quite understand what it means even after looking into it. Doesn’t it prevent certain things from being show to minors?

    • silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 years ago

      the bill is intentionally vague. it’s left up to state attorneys general to decide what that means and it requires websites to collect id data to verify age. several conservative politicians have bragged that they’re going to use this bill to go after online queer communities. and the Biden admin and DNC generally support the bill so it’s likely to pass.

      • rjs001@lemmygrad.mldeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Ah, I see. I think age verification isn’t a bad thing if it were being used to ensure kid’s can’t see sexually explicit things and lie about their age but leaving it vague is definitely a bad thing if it will be used to attack LGBT groups.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.mldeleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      The “Think of the Children!” excuse has been used by homophobes as an excuse to persecute them as long as there have been homophobes.

      • rjs001@lemmygrad.mldeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Oh, I understand. Of course we should protect children from unsavory content but I certainly don’t trust homophobes to be the ones deciding how that is done

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.mldeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Exactly. Anytime the US gov tries to announce that they are doing something to “protect the children” 9/10 times it’s just an excuse to persecute or punish non cis-white people.