The title says it all!

  • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    We may not all think alike or obtain the same Linux ISOs. I am okay with that and feel we all should be okay with differing opinions and viewpoints, especially in a secular society.

    • Night Monkey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Based comment history. If I had any invites left I would have given it to you. I can’t stand people who stalk people’s comment history. It’s friggin stupid

      • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thanks. We reached that dystopian part where people are judged based on their social credits and “likability” and conformance index to the masses.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I expect to be held liable for people I invite to other people’s places, therefore I don’t invite randos or people that have proven to have little regard for others.

        • weaponG@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Invitations and referrals do carry liability. However, I would say that if you have a differing opinion, others attack with little regard. The “mob mentality” is inert and affluent in social media. Then you are left to defend your differing viewpoint, leaving a trail of more dissenting comments which are also attacked to the nth degree. I honestly thought this federated experiment would be different. I was wrong.