The voter turnout dropped heavily in the first phase when compared to previous elections. What is exactly happening? Are people losing faith in democracy? Or they are getting lazy thinking “aayega to modi hi”? Whatever it is, it’s dangerous for democracy and must be fixed.

  • n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    What is there to be excited about. Even with India’s massive multi-party system, there still is not one party that is anti-nationalist. When I lived in the US nearly half of my neighbors were anti-nationalist and proud of it. I cam to believe they were right that nationalism is a disease that must be irradiated from this planet as it does nothing but divide people and create sense of superiority in ones “own people”.

    Clearly Modi needs to be defeated, but its difficult to see how that is going to happen, and the option(s) to replace him with aren’t a lot better.

    • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      People are so pissed off that they don’t want to vote anyone. They just want to vote NOTA.

      That doesn’t change stuff, right?
      If it’s popular, some people should band together and create a small group or party of their own, or support a independent candidate or so who’d be more supportive. And wouldn’t there be atleast one leftist party there, to take up the issue?

      Choosing not to vote would just make the other parties write them off. If it’s using the vote as a way to bring attention would be better, then yeah, it’s ok. But if they’re really not voting then that’s bad.

        • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’d rather vote.

          I respect you for that.

          caste-based politics has become the next new

          Outright caste politics?
          I’m from Kerala and we do have caste/religious equations going on in the background, but most of the time it never reaches the foreground.

    • Clot@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Will read.

      Nota is just irrelevant and should be fixed, even if 99% vote for it, the candidate who got most of the remaining 1% will win (doesn’t make sense).

      • मुक्त@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s only half of what is wrong with NOTA. The other half is that the voters who use NOTA are more likely to be the educated and mindful ones… and the party that was in power when NOTA was implemented, wanted such voters to squander their votes.

      • n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        ven if 99% vote for it, the candidate who got most of the remaining 1% will win (doesn’t make sense). I NOTA wins I think the seat should be vacated for that term.