• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I wonder how many US Presidents actually were believers and how many were just going through the motions because until recently in our history not identifying as one made you a pariah in the US, unwelcome in all the little clubs that could lead to the Presidency.

    Obama seemed way too logical and analytical to actually buy into such irrational things. Trump clearly doesn’t, purely out of narcissistic self-importance making himself his own deity/object of worship.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not every Christian believes in a literal Genesis and a 6 thousand year old earth etc. , but yeah, probably many were likely (and/or surely) deist, agnostic, uncaring, or even atheist.

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Honestly I have more respect for the literalists than the ones that recognize the crazy, but pick and choose which beliefs within their religion they’re willing to swallow the crazy of rather than walking away.

        If you’re going to choose to be a nutter, at least fucking commit.

        • olutukko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Amen. This is what they should teach in schools. It’s not like you would go outside and tell people that you’re a flat earther but you don’t really believe that earh doesn’t have curve. Then why do people go outside claiming they a christians but don’t really believe in thw crap that happened in the great folk lore fantasy book called the bible. I would love to read it some day completely, like a folk lore book, not to convert. Same goes for koran. It would be interesting

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You’d be too annoyed by the contradictions, repetition and nonsense to finish it.

            There are some pretty raunchy bits though.

            • olutukko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah propably. I should maybe just stick to kalevala. It’s a huge collection of finnish folk lore which almost got lost but then some guy decided to collect it all and make a book. It’s actually extremly significant for finland and tolkien took inspiration out of it while writing lotr

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I started it. But when I got to the part in Genesis where there’s entire chapters devoted to the generations of who begat who, I realized that it was crappily written and wouldn’t be enjoyable.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean there’s merit to the idea that modern Christians don’t follow the old testament. The whole idea of being a Christian is recognizing that Jesus started a new convenient and wiped out the old rules.

          If only Christians would actually follow Jesus, instead of picking the shit they conveniently already agree with.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          It kinda depends what you pick and choose. I’m no Christian, but I think Jesus had some pretty good ideas about how to treat others.

          • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I also happen to appreciate many of the philosophies of the fictional character Jesus Christ of the New Testament.

            Whether or not there was a Jesus Christ of Nazareth who walked the Earth, the individual of the Bible is a fictional version, the Santa Clause to Saint Nicholas of Myra.

            In any event, agreeing with some or even all of another’s positions shouldn’t equate to deification.

            I appreciate the writings of Karl Marx, yet I recognize their shortcomings, and have never worshipped or defied him or his work.

            Tldr you don’t have to believe Jesus was God in human form, or even believe he was more than a fiction, to happen to agree with his written ideology that can be paraphrased as “Be excellent to each other.”

              • Klear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                He said it was impossible, but that God can make even impossible things come true. I always saw it as “I’m not gonna torture anyone in hell, but I can’t just say that outright because a lot of you guys are assholes and would take advantage of it”.

                Then again, I’m not a Christian, if you can’t tell.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Nah, he was straight up calling it ungodly.

                  And Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly, I say to you, only with difficulty will a rich person enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.”

                  • Klear@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    It goes on, you know.

                    When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?”

                    Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”

                    It’s bad enough when Christians cherry pick from the Bible. No need to stoop to their level.

        • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Every single religion on earth cherry picks beliefs. Including and especially the “literalists”.

          It’s impossible to form a consistent belief system based on an inconsistent and self-contradicting document like the Bible, which is why there isn’t any such system.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s like the “liberalism of Christianity.” No base principles, fence-sitting and willing to go with whatever message serves their interests.

        • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The bible is clearly written not as literal truth. The literalists aren’t even comprehending it or the messages the author intended. They are very modern in their interpretation taking religious ‘truths’ to be literal truths. They’ve ironically been heavily influenced by science, just not in the way compatible with science.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Many of the founding fathers were Deists, which while technically is a belief in a higher power, also wouldn’t fly with the mainstream religious voters of today. Thomas Paine was a flat out atheist and still remains today the only founding father without a monument. I’m of mixed feelings about that as a monument could be considered idolatry and he might not really want that.