As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn’t show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn’t necessarily be everyone’s cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.
EDIT
After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:
“We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I’m sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs.”
This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state “we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules”.
Probably violated TOS. “pro life” is a descriptor for a set of loosely connected beliefs aimed at subjugating half of the world’s population. Find an instance that is OK with slavery and hate speech, it will probably go better for you there.
I checked the terms for lemmy.world and mastodon.world. I don’t what rule was explicitly broken. That’s why I am asking to discuss this with the mod team.
Might be a good spot for one of the instance moderators to chime in. Not sure if it’s appropriate to tag them in posts like this but it might be a nice spot to provide a clear explanation that others can point to for future examples of this type of removal.
I didn’t see anything about misinformation in the CoC but one of them might have felt the community was inflammatory. It’ll also be interesting to see if this is one of those things they just don’t want on their instance. While we would like impartial instances in general, they are running it for us and Lemmy is likely in a limbo period of trying to establish precedence for what is allowed.
One of the reasons I wanted to follow this post is to hopefully get an even clearer explanation on what is allowed and what to expect going forward from this instance.
FYI, I updated the post with a follow-up.
Yup. Totally reasonable take. I’m all for following the rules. I just didn’t see any rules being broken by creating the !prolife@lemmy.world community.
I wasn’t able to see the posts from the community as it has been removed, but the comments in that community from you point to the possibility that it was inflammatory.
A response from an instance moderator should help clarify the reasoning though.
From their desktop site:
Questions/issues can be posted [to https://lemmy.world/c/support] or emailed to info@lemmy.world.
I’d start there versus putting them on blast here.
Are there pro-choice communities?
Pro-choice ranges anywhere from using contraceptives and real reproductive health, to murdering babies just because they aren’t wanted.
Your opinions are as valid as theirs. It doesn’t matter which one of you are wrong.
∴
You appear to think abortion is the act of killing the fetus. This is wrong. Abortion is the act of removing the fetus from the womb.
It would be more comparable to removing a braindead human “vegetable” from life support.
By contrast, a staunch pro-life view endangers actual living breathing humans, by denying essential health care to those with non-viable pregnancies.
So, yes, pro-choice communities exist, because being pro-choice is the morally correct path. Anyone guided by critical inquiry instead of childish ick factor will arrive at this conclusion.
“You appear to think abortion is the act of killing the fetus. This is wrong. Abortion is the act of removing the fetus from the womb.”
So what typically happens when you remove a fetus (with a heartbeat, brain activity, and arguably, a functioning CNS) from the womb? It dies.
While I believe you are almost completely wrong, it’s your right to discuss it. It’s mine to disagree. However, one side can’t discuss their beliefs if the other side who controls the button says no.
You’re saying that abortions are used to end non-viable pregnancies. I’m saying that there are millions of people who do it because they just don’t want the product of their intercourse. Some abortions I can accept, in very specific circumstances, but we will still never agree.
deleted by creator