• 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Mao is great too but Stalin writing style is literally “marxism for dummies”. His sequential and structured style of writing can’t be easier to read.

    • Kaplya [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Stalin’s Marxism and the National Question (~1913) was probably his best work.

      Lenin loved it so much that he proclaimed it to be “the Bolshevik Party’s definitive declaration on the national question”.

      Even Trotsky, his arch-nemesis, considered it a great work and had to throw in the jabs “hmm… why has Stalin never published another work of such quality before and after this? very suspicious… don’t you think… was it really written by Stalin himself??” lol.

      Stalin’s Marxism and the National Question also became the theoretical foundation of the People’s Republic of China’s classification of its 56 ethnic nationalities, based on the criteria that Stalin had laid out.

      Having said that, the Comintern did make a lot of mistakes when it comes to advising anti-colonial struggle in the third world. Mao’s theses were far more applicable to poorly developed colonies in this regard.

      • o_d [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Marxism and the National Question is up there for one of my favorite pieces of Marxist literature. I’m also a big fan of Dialectical and Historical Materialism. Stalin was quite good at breaking down Marxist concepts into language that is more accessible and easier to understand. I had a hard grasping dialectical materialism until I read Stalin’s work on it.

        • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          completely agree, i even advocate for recommending Dialectical and Historical Materialism to beginners. It is an essential read for anyone serious about reading theory.

    • BakedBeanEnjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I always thought Mao didn’t translate well tbh. He relies a lot on Chinese metaphors but sometimes they just don’t work and you’re left going “Jesse wtf is this.”

      Stalin is a bit dry but he the information per page is probably the best of the Marxist writers.