• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Traditional chemical propulsion is great for blasting rockets off the surface of the Earth, but such machines are terribly inefficient for moving around the Solar System.

    The basic idea is straightforward: A nuclear reactor rapidly heats up a propellant, probably liquid hydrogen, and then this gas expands and is passed out a nozzle, creating thrust.

    Finally, in 2020, the curious folks at the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency said they wanted to test a flyable nuclear thermal propulsion system.

    On Wednesday, NASA and DARPA announced they had selected Lockheed Martin to serve as the primary contractor to assemble the experimental nuclear thermal reactor vehicle (X-NTRV) and its engine.

    This final orbit has yet to be determined, but it is likely to be 700 to 2,000 km above the surface of the Earth, such that the vehicle’s reentry into the planet’s atmosphere will take place hundreds of years after any nuclear reactions occur.

    Dodson said this mission would attempt to store liquid hydrogen in its ultra-cold state for a couple of months, allowing enough time for multiple tests of the nuclear thermal engine.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • TheObserver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank god for this bot. Way too many articles get posted here filled with so much useless info that you have to skim through to get to the actual news part. Like I’m sorry journalist but no idgaf about what the fuck you ate today get the fuck on with the article.