• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s an… Interesting take. I guess it depends on how you’re defining ‘kink’. I think of the people I’ve known that were into impact play, blood, vomit, bondage (no, not fuzzy handcuffs; as an aside, don’t use real handcuffs because they’ll cause nerve damage), mummification, age play (!), consensual non-consent (with varying degrees of how much consent they wanted to give prior to anything), lifetime M/s, etc. and most of them were between average and overweight. Extremely physically fit people were significantly under-represented at the conferences and conventions that I’ve been to. Personally, I’d say that if it not at least something that kink.com would host–or would be too extreme for their credit card processors–then it’s not really kink, but just variations on vanilla.

    If you define kink as anything other than lights-off missionary, then eh, maybe?

    'Course, at one time, oral sex was considered to be an extreme form of perversion.

    • Temmie @lemmynsfw.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      🥺👉👈 it was just a fun little joke.

      But to answer you: I’m part of my local kink community. There are all sorts of meetings ranging from workshops, kinky stuff or just having coffee. In my experience, the body types I’ve seen there are quite mixed and there isn’t really a majority of any of them. I don’t really mean that petite girls are the kinkiest of all, just joking for dramatic effect haha