• bane_killgrind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    It should be banned for everyone. This exception is just allowing the businesses to wind down slowly.

    Did I get a choice being in the group that these people marketed their poison to? What about my rights to have safe products available?

    It’s not anti democratic to make laws against harmful things. Specifically harmful things that make you quickly chemically dependent on it.

    • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not anti democratic to make laws against harmful things. Specifically harmful things that make you quickly chemically dependent on it.

      I didn’t say it was. Banning only a specific group is what’s anti democratic.

      • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Listen we already have age restrictions on different drugs, this is just progressively raising the age limit on a specific one.

        The alternative is ban them outright, putting thousands of people immediately out of work, leave small businesses with thousands of dollars of garbage stock, and leave addicts without any supply.

        Do you think that or continuing unrestricted sales are better options? Go cry more, stop advocating to flip the table.

        • pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You’re pleasant. That’s very tortured logic to avoid the obvious that they’re banning other people from using something that they aren’t willing to ban for themselves.