Look at the fingers. You always have to look at the fingers

A viral photo of a guy smoking in McDonald’s is completely fake — and of course made by AI::Look at the fingers. You always have to look at the fingers

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.eeEnglish
    32·
    9 months ago

    Lets see:

    • Straw in the fries container
    • Chest hair growing thru his shirt
    • “Cocacola” text on the mug
    • His hands and those hamburgers
    • MODLIDANI sign on the wall
    • The heck is that white hat on that dude on the background
    • TheFriar@lemm.eeEnglish
      8·
      9 months ago

      You’ve never heard of the fishing hat that dreamed of being a baseball hat?

    • weew@lemmy.caEnglish
      4·
      9 months ago
      • exposed chest hair with t-shirt
      • straw in fries
      • hat
      • Smoking inside restaurant

      You blame AI, but that’s just the 80s.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      That’s not hair growing through the shirt that’s simply a bare chest. AI can paint both shirt and chest just fine, but doesn’t understand garments, doesn’t understand that if you have t-shirt sleeves you don’t have a bare chest. Could happen with a dress shirt but then the collar is missing: It’s denim-on-skin in the chest and neck area which the AI can easily make consistent because it’s continuous, then shirt-and-denim on the shoulders, which also makes sense. It’s the combination that doesn’t.

    • ItsAFake@lemmus.orgEnglish
      1·
      9 months ago

      White hat dude is definitely a demon attempting to blend into public for the first time, look at those eyes.

      • XTornado@lemmy.mlEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        But they look normal? People keep saying that, but except the weird position which it’s a picture which it could have caught you in a weird position and that’s it. Like we only see 4 finger on one hand but the thumb could be bended and not visible from the angle.

        If you zoom yeah…one finger seems to end up converting to burger but that requires quite a deep look.

        But maybe I am missing something.