In Portal, using the portal gun to get to the moon is the obvious space travel usage, but I think people are overlooking how it’d let you trivially break the rocket equation.

Hell, you could build a >1g torchship using nothing but the ocean.

  • Foone🏳️‍⚧️@digipres.clubOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    And that’s just thinking about a static arrangement of portals. You could also use a dynamic arrangement where you use gravity to accelerate mass to arbitrarily high speeds and then fling it out the back

    • Foone🏳️‍⚧️@digipres.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you could make portals bigger you could also have a fun setup where you build your spaceship and then just let gravity accelerate it though a portal-loop.
      You get going as fast as you want, then just swap the portals so you’re now aimed at Mars.

      • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        @foone@digipres.club I seem to recall Larry Niven played with this stuff in his teleportation short stories in the 70s (notably “All the bridges rusting”). And I had fun with it in “Glasshouse”.

        • Adam Bursey@me.dm
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          @cstross@wandering.shop @foone@digipres.club Peter F. Hamilton also uses the idea in a lot of various ways in his Salvation books. E.g. why deal with complicated propulsion systems when you can chuck the ingress end of a portal into a star and stick the egress end on the back of your ship.

          • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            @abursey@me.dm @foone@digipres.club A portal gun (with the other end of the portal inside the photosphere of a blue-white supergiant) makes a really neat blaster!

            • LisPi@udongein.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              @cstross@wandering.shop @foone@digipres.club @abursey@me.dm Backblast might make it a weapon of last resort, though.

              • Foone🏳️‍⚧️@digipres.clubOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                @lispi314@udongein.xyz @abursey@me.dm @cstross@wandering.shop true, but the fun part of a portal-ship is that there’s really no difference between a crewed lander and a remote-controlled doomsday missile.

                if you land somewhere uninhabited and/or friendly, you can drop a portal and then send people through. if it’s unfriendly, you open the supergiant portal, and have the portal gun throw itself through a return-home portal that instantly closes. you build another ship

      • Foone🏳️‍⚧️@digipres.clubOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Anyway the lazy, boring way to use a portal and pretend you aren’t violating a bunch of physical laws is to just use it for fuel transport.
        You have a bunch of fuel on the ground, a tiny tank on your rocket, and you keep topping off the rocket’s tank by piping in the fuel.

        • Foone🏳️‍⚧️@digipres.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          BTW, as a variant on the kzinti lesson, the portals are extremely dangerous as a weapon, because of how good they are as a weapon.

          Ignoring the obvious ways to fight with them like opening a portal on the enemy’s hull, shoving out a nuke and then closing the portal…

          You could also just have a rock that you’re letting accelerate to arbitrary speeds in a vacuum. That’s free unbounded kinetic energy, the only limitation being the “charge” time.

        • Luna Lactea@furry.engineer
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          @foone@digipres.club The Pierson’s Puppeteers did this to fuel probes in Ringworld. The only difference was their technology required a physical teleportation device to be placed at the destination instead of just opening a portal anywhere, & transmission was limited to the speed of light.

      • VeNT@mastodon.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        @foone@digipres.club I get the feeling it would be amazing for some fraction of a second before either:
        Relativity smacked you in the face
        Friction did it’s thing
        Physics gets angry and stops the earths rotation around the sun
        Or
        The people running this simulated universe turn it off and patch that bug before starting over.

      • Plan A to Y@furry.engineer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        @foone@digipres.club thread a rope with a weight through two vertical portals so the rope is pulled through infinitely as the weight drops.

        Now you have infinite rotational energy to run a generator and the thermodynamics police are definitely going to break down your door

      • Christian Steinert@hachyderm.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        @foone@digipres.club The hard part will be aligning the (“outgoing”) portal so perfectly, that you do not end up anywhere but your far away target.

    • Passenger@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      @foone@digipres.club

      I think - I am a physicist but not a rocket engineer - that a portal wouldn’t propel anything.

      Putting a portal on the underside of the spaceship and another in the deep ocean just makes the two of those places adjacent. The water would spray into space (and probably immediately freeze) but the reaction force wouldn’t be on the ship: there’s no water pushing back against it, after all. If there’s any reaction force it would be against the ocean.

    • Qazm@tiggi.es
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      @foone@digipres.club That raises a question: Are portals subject to reaction forces? If not, a deflector would still be required and solid ‘fuel’ may be less usable.