• misophist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    My understanding is that the US primaries are private affairs and the organisations can pick their candidates however they want. The democrats certainly did some unethical shit to snub Bernie in favor of Hillary, but I don’t know if Primary shenanigans can qualify as the crime of election fraud (unless some of the states protect their primary elections in the same way they do for real elections).

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, they can’t legally qualify what happened as election fraud, but I certainly qualify it as such.

    • Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      See this is what I disagree with when you have states that actually fund the two parties. In Washington there are tax allocated resources for the gop/dems and third parties get screwed. So I think it’s messed up when the party head just gets to pick.

      • misophist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, those 2 parties have had a stranglehold on our entire lawmaking infrastructure since anybody currently alive was born. They’ve had a loooooong time to implement election rules and campaign finance laws that only benefit themselves at the expense of those smaller parties.

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they want to turn themselves into the government, they ought to be beholden to the constitution for their elections.