• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s no financial benefit to having such a network in Canada given airplanes exist for quick travel. There simply isn’t a need to move a large number of Canadians across the country on a regular basis, and the country is HUGE. Building that much high speed rail would be a waste of resources.

    We’d be far better off investing in a connection for Vancouver down the west coast of the US, and Toronto/Montreal down the east coast of the US.

    • aDuckk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mentioned further down the thread that Canada doesn’t have the population for significant passenger rail development, which gets brought up a lot in this discussion. I can’t directly dispute that point, but doesn’t around 90% of the population live within 100km of the US border? We don’t need a network across the entire land mass, just hit at least one major city in each mainland province (sorry territories & maritimes) to start. One line for 90% seems like it would be a good deal unless I am missing something.

    • clockwork_axolotl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Busiest highway: Highway 401 in Ontario, Canada, has volumes surpassing an average of 500,000 vehicles per day.

      That paragraph is straight out of google. Saying that we don’t need high speed rail because we do not have the volume is blatantly untrue.