This is why I’ve always found the whole hoping for a regime change in Russia so hilarious. Putin is basically a moderate in Russian politics, and it’s pretty much guaranteed that whoever replaces him is going to be a lot more hardline towards the west. If they think Putin is difficult, just wait till they have to deal with somebody like Kadyrov.
Honestly don’t know the actual logic was there. Stalin did do a lot of questionable shit after the war though like abandoning Greece, which led to his falling out with Tito and breakdown of relations with Yugoslavia. Seems like he was really keen on honoring whatever deals he mad with the west at the end of the war for whatever reason.
I’ve read somewhere that the USSR supported the zionist entity because they felt it was a form of decolonisation, ending the British occupation is Palestine. Also, back then zionism had some superficially leftist tendencies and there was a widespread belief on the left that the zionist entity would become a “socialist” society.
It was not the greatest moment for the analytical power of marxism-leninism. The communist movement failed the Palestinians.
This is why I’ve always found the whole hoping for a regime change in Russia so hilarious. Putin is basically a moderate in Russian politics, and it’s pretty much guaranteed that whoever replaces him is going to be a lot more hardline towards the west. If they think Putin is difficult, just wait till they have to deal with somebody like Kadyrov.
deleted by creator
Oh yeah, I don’t think Kadyrov himself is a likely candidate, I’m saying somebody with a similar mindset could easily get in power.
deleted by creator
If Putin runs, I can’t see how he doesn’t get another term.
deleted by creator
Honestly don’t know the actual logic was there. Stalin did do a lot of questionable shit after the war though like abandoning Greece, which led to his falling out with Tito and breakdown of relations with Yugoslavia. Seems like he was really keen on honoring whatever deals he mad with the west at the end of the war for whatever reason.
deleted by creator
I’d be interested to know what the actual thinking there was as well.
I’ve read somewhere that the USSR supported the zionist entity because they felt it was a form of decolonisation, ending the British occupation is Palestine. Also, back then zionism had some superficially leftist tendencies and there was a widespread belief on the left that the zionist entity would become a “socialist” society.
It was not the greatest moment for the analytical power of marxism-leninism. The communist movement failed the Palestinians.
I think a Medvedev 2.0 presidency would be even more hardline. Kadyrov is actually kind of a softie.