• wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    In other words, no not even close to what I said.

    Often these little legalese situations are illegal or legally undefined, and the only reason it holds is because no one has pushed against it

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any terms of service agreement. When legally challenged, they usually do not hold up in court.

        Playstation makes you sign one that says you dont get to own the games you pay for and they can take them away whenever. A judge would likely tell them thats illegal, and they have to render services paid.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a reason the “you behave like an ass, you lose access” part is not usually the one anyone challenges in court.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lol, or I trust you can type things like “terms of service legal standing” into a search bar, and have better things to do than research something I already know for a stranger who wont read anything I find for them.

                Look through my comments. The last dipshit who played this game ghosted me after I found them 4 sources. Guaranteed, they did not read them.

                If you actually care? You can find the info. We both know you didnt care what I brought you, tho, which is why youre pretending a knock off reddit forum needs citations to be correct.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I googled it and looks like you were wrong.

                  Edit: also lol at “This isn’t reddit, I can spout whatever crap I want without backing it up”

                  • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    “the law doesnt support this when push comes to shove, judges do not side with it”

                    “Source?”

                    “If you care you can find it yourself, this is a comment section”

                    “RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEE”

                    Lol ok bud