“help amplify the stories and voices of the Python community”
I’m skeptical of anyone that uses this type of language. I would get it if they made a position for someone that was already doing the work but she doesn’t have more than a thousand followers on twitter.
I stopped going to python events because the amount of woke bullshit was off the chart. It was rare to find decent talks from competent people, and I preferred to watch them online from names I recognise rather than going there and waste hours being “educated” about “the message”
Could you expand, what are you skeptical of and what do you mean by “type of langugage”?
I would consider this fairly normal annoucement style language and be much more interested in the practical tasks someone does, before prejudging someone.
“help amplify the stories and voices of the Python community”
I’m skeptical of anyone that uses this type of language. I would get it if they made a position for someone that was already doing the work but she doesn’t have more than a thousand followers on twitter.
I stopped going to python events because the amount of woke bullshit was off the chart. It was rare to find decent talks from competent people, and I preferred to watch them online from names I recognise rather than going there and waste hours being “educated” about “the message”
Could you expand, what are you skeptical of and what do you mean by “type of langugage”?
I would consider this fairly normal annoucement style language and be much more interested in the practical tasks someone does, before prejudging someone.
It’s meaningless, corporate bullshit speak.
How so? The meaning is perfectly clear to me.
I’m equally confused here. Is it supposed to be an anti-woke thing? I didn’t get any kind of vibe like that from the article.
Are you implying that corporate bullshit is woke? Because if we can not discern both, we have a problem.