• BlacknightEM21@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am a professional referee and this worries me little bit. The number of conversations we have about yellows and reds are insane. And even with just 2 cards, we do not have consensus on what a card should sometimes be.

    Now you add an “orange” card and now these discussions become even more complicated. As someone who doesn’t like dissent as much as the other guy, I do not think this will be a good solution.

    This is exactly like VAR. Great in concept, but it will not be executed correctly.

    • Stay_Beautiful_@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And even with just 2 cards, we do not have consensus on what a card should sometimes be.

      Which is EXACTLY why this “orange card” would be useful. If it’s ambiguous whether something should be a yellow or red throw up the orange and send them off for a few minutes

    • jamesbeil@alien.top
      cake
      B
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Grassroots officials have been suceessfully implementing sin bins for C2 for the last three years - surely as a professional you can recognise dissent and sanction it appropriately?

    • RiyadMehrez@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      why does it make it more complicated?

      you as an alleged pro ref, know there are cynical fouls yes? they will now get a yellow and a sin bin. what is the issue?

      its the exact same as DOGSO and pens.

      did we not just successfully remove double jeopardy? i seem to believe we did yes? so its the same fucking principle