• thedanyes@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t it partially your fault on the hinges for buying a non-Thinkpad? Asus doesn’t even have a business line of laptops, as far as I’m aware, so shouldn’t even be an option.

    Little bit like buying an HP Pavilion and complaining about build quality.

      • FireLucid@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the reasoning is that if you buy a mid-quality machine, it will not have top quality manufacturing?

        Thinkpads are pretty solid business class machines.

        • deWaardt@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even when buying a mid-grade device I kinda expect it to not be complete dogfight garbage and break in stupid ways two days after the warranty ends.

          • thedanyes@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mid-grade is pretty vague. Laptops in general are designed to be disposable while ‘checking off the boxes’ for marketing feature lists - with few exceptions.

            • deWaardt@alien.topB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But one should realistically be able to expect a €500 laptop to last more than two years, right?

              • FireLucid@alien.topB
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I work in a school and we purchase a whole heap of laptops every year. For that price we’d be looking at a student device, defenitely one of the cheaper ones. But yes, we’d expect more than 2 years out of them. Again, we don’t buy consumer devices because they have horrible build quality and get an education + bulk discount.

                • deWaardt@alien.topB
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I just think we shouldn’t accept that cheaper consumer devices get built so poorly they just crumble to pieces after two years.

                  While I hate to call on the “everything was better back then” argument, a €500 laptop back in 2008 would be a shitty laptop, but it would remain functional while shitty for basically ever.

                  So many of these cheap laptops with super crappy Celeron processors just keep going even if they are slow as fuck and were barely tolerable back in the day. And when RAM or the storage device dies, you can replace them and keep the machine going. Not so much with many modern devices.

                  I feel like we’re literally engineering them to fail.

                  • thedanyes@alien.topB
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The way we stop accepting it is we stop buying them. Whoever bought a Lenovo Ideapad Flex or a Dell Inspiron needs to stop and take a second to do some research on repairability and build quality instead of buying based on a list of specs.

    • karlrolson@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There were Thinkpads in the same class action IIRC. Just a bad design and a bad part used across their line up with some of their 2 in 1s for a while.