I found myself often setting the deck to 50 fps to save some performance but still get a very fluid picture.
Do you think running the deck at the highest frequency and halving that will be substantially better then anything from 46-50 or maybe even 46-60 at native frequency?
what about 60 fps at 90 hz? any benefits from this? is this then 1 and 1/2 (60 + 30)?
No, that would be horrible, you only want fps that are Hz/2 Hz/3 Hz/4 etc. So for 80Hz that would be 80, 40, 20, 15, 8
Jep. That was was I thinking too.
Yep, this is how I’m running D4 now. Used to be a 40/40 guy on previous LED deck. 45 works amazingly, feels smooth as butter & the deck is whisper quiet!
Not necessarily. Sometimes 45 FPS is still a bridge too far. You’ll still get the same benefit at 40 FPS: the screen will run at 80Hz with frame doubling. Even 30 FPS will feel better, because you now get frame tripling instead of just doubling. That means it will feel a little smoother and input lag will be less. Ironically, cranking back to 30 FPS to enjoy better battery life and performance may actually see a little more interest, if anything.
Is 45fps/90hz really smoother than just 45fps and 45hz ? Ice never heard about this triple or double with the Hz before this steam deck was released
I’ve heard this from many sources, but it’s not something that was really a thing before on steam deck of course. 60Hz and 30 fps at 60 is kind of a known standard
Yes, because it’s still able to process input through the duplicate frames provided by 45fps at 90hz. At 45/45 there is a gap between refreshes where input cannot be processed.
The OLED Steam Deck may have popularized discussion of it recently, but this is not some new thing. Well established.