• Bubbly-Tomato-2293@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sorry, I’m not quite getting your point. originally you said that Toney is only 1.23 havertz, implying he is cheap. Then you said that Havertz is an overpay, which undermines your initial argument. Do you have a point to make about Toney, or are you just taking shots at Havertz? Because there are other threads out there for that.

    • dispelthemyth@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe you lack the brain power to understand that multiple things can be true, they are hardly conflicting statements.

      1 - if arsenal paid 80m for Toney that would be 1.23x of the Havertz fee

      2 - Havertz was overpriced but arsenal have now basically told premier league teams they will overpay for even average players thus Brentford will know they can charge a decent fee

      • Bubbly-Tomato-2293@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes there was an email to every PL manager to that effect when Arsenal completed the signing.

        As I have said above, the situations behind both transfers are very different. But your latest response, and also your comment history shows that you are probably incapable of taking a nuanced look at this, so I won’t waste my breath further.