vitzli-mmc@alien.topB to Data Hoarder@selfhosted.forumEnglish · 1 year agoHeads up for a data corruption bug in ZFS, few versions affected, might have started at 2.1.x, but many reports on 2.2.xgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkHeads up for a data corruption bug in ZFS, few versions affected, might have started at 2.1.x, but many reports on 2.2.xgithub.comvitzli-mmc@alien.topB to Data Hoarder@selfhosted.forumEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squaretatiwtr@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat did not work for me on ubuntu, but did on my debian/proxmox distribution proxmox: zfs-0.8.3-pve1 zfs-kmod-0.8.3-pve1 ubuntu: version: 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu26 srcversion: 0968F94158D646E259D86B5 vermagic: 4.4.0-142-generic SMP mod_unload modversions retpoline looks like im using an ancient version and am ok?
minus-squaregabest@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI also use a version close to that, 0.something. See absolutely no reason to upgrade. It just works. It’s the version that has the fast scrub already.
That did not work for me on ubuntu, but did on my debian/proxmox distribution
proxmox:
ubuntu:
looks like im using an ancient version and am ok?
I also use a version close to that, 0.something. See absolutely no reason to upgrade. It just works. It’s the version that has the fast scrub already.