• JimiVegas@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The headline is misleading…but personally I’m done with the PL. How can you take it seriously when a billionaire bought Chelsea and then they bought it, and the a State bought City and they won it. It’s not sporting competition any longer.

    • PangolinMandolin@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      u/TheTelegraph is an account who’s only role is to post Telegraph articles on subs like r/soccer and here. I don’t understand why this doesn’t break rules around self promo because its clearly a corporate account and doesn’t contribute to the site in any typical way that is usually required i.e. comments and conversations with other users

      Edit - to add, so whilst other users who genuinely want to contribute to the sub might see an interesting article and post it for discussion, the Telegraph account simply posts every article without further thought or analysis. The former is people who understand the interests of the sub and exercising their judgment to share things that would be of interest, the latter is just spam posting

  • roofilopolis@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gotta make sure whatever they end up fining city, city earns right back.

    This is so dumb. England is competitive because of this. Stop making it easier for top clubs to stay on top.

  • Ornery_Ad_9871@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This just means that more teams will inevitably end up in Evertons situation unable to compete. This is bad news for all but top 6. Rigged

    • khoabear@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everton situation was not caused by the lack of money but the extremely wasteful use of money on poor transfers.

      • Mantooth77@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re missing the point. The PL sustainable rules are based on a threshold for losses allowed. Losses are a function of revenue. If the bigger clubs will get a higher share of that revenue, that just gives them an even greater advantage over the smaller clubs.

        The most realistic way for smaller clubs to compete would be to spend more in the short term so they can buy better players. That way they can get a share of more TV money and European Football.

        But, if by doing that they break the rules, then they don’t have the ability to do so and the status quo remains with the exception of the occcasional Leicester City like fluke season.

      • IncomingBalls@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whilst I don’t disagree with your point that there was a string of poor decision making regarding transfers, that’s not the reason we’re in this mess. We’re building a new stadium and one of the main investors had to be ousted (Russia/Ukraine war, you can suss it out). This, on top of an already poor financial situation, thanks to our wonderful owner Fahrad Moshiri, are what led to the current situation.

        • Britz10@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stadium work doesn’t really count towards FFP and Usmanov was funneling money through the stadium, like that bogus fee given to have first rejection on naming rights.

          • Toffeeman_1878@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are half right (and also half wrong 😬) about the stadium work. The PL changed the rules halfway through the period Everton were assessed for. One year they were allowed to set aside the interest payments on loans for the new stadium but the next year they weren’t allowed to set these aside. The PL could at least try to keep their rules consistent.

  • EmigmaticDork@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Get rid of FFP, and create a salary cap with a luxury tax, where all the excess spend gets sent to the lower clubs. It’s the only way that these small teams might be able to compete someday.

  • PhilosophicalBeers@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also they announced th e increase will be applied retroactively to past budgets. Coincidentally Man City art not guilty of any breaches

  • salomanoder@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boys, I’ve been winning serious money thanks to this girl who’s been posting her betting picks on to her OnlyFans, at first I was skeptical but boy… was I wrong. She’s hitting every week consistently and is sharing it with everyone. See to believe it… Onlyfans.com/jrosexxx

  • Resident-Cup2599@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man city are the spoiled rich kids of the premier league they have ONE HUNDRED and FIFTEEN breaches of ffp and the premier league just ignored it but with Everton who tried to follow ffp get ONE charge they jump to punish them without delay

  • Yupadej@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    FFP is designed for some historical teams to monopolize the league. All the new rules Newcastle and relegating Everton for 20 mil overspend. Chelsea and City who became successful at the expense of the big reds in FFP trouble as well. I hope Everton fans realize that they have won their last title.

  • Sheeverton@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People need to realise what a large factor behind our collapse was.

    We did well, and we wanted to continue to do well and even improve, so we spent more money and paid higher wages, we continued to do well so spent more money and paid higher wages, the amount we was spending fell within FFP but only if we qualified for Europe.

    Then we didn’t qualify for Europe and all of a sudden FFP was after us because our spending was too high, FFP is there to kill you the ONE season where you don’t perform so well, forcing you to sell key players or shrink your squad, which in effect played a large role in killing us

  • Normal_Juggernaut@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So it’s going from a 1.6 ratio to a 1.8… I’m bad at maths but how would it have impacted the prize money difference last season?