There’s been confusion about why Ram put big 3.6 liter V6 as a range extender on the 2025 Ramcahrger. Surely that is terribly inefficient?
No, it’s not.
Ram states following specs: 92kWh battery pack, 145 miles of electric range and 690 miles of total range, 27 gallon gas tank.
Electric range of 145 miles with 92 kWh means electricity consumption of 63 kWh/100 miles. Full tank contains 920 kWh of energy and gives 545 miles of range. That is consumption of 168 kWh/100 miles. The electric energy needed for 545 miles is 343 kWh, so the efficiency of the range extender is 37%. The generator and electronics have some energy loss so the efficiency of the V6 engine is closer to 40%. That’s crazy efficient for a gas engine.
Why is it so high? Why not use smaller engine?
Engine efficiency is highest at relatively slow speed and nearly full load. That big V6 can produce the required power at low RPM but needs to work hard. That’s very efficient. Smaller engine would need to run very fast which decreases efficiency.
In summary the V6 is very efficient at this particular application which suits it very well.
Are they still using the pentastar v6 that:
Has constant oil issues
Rocker and lifter problems as low as 40,000 miles
Water pump issues
Run rough and noisy even when new
Why would anyone want the above PLUS the complexity of an EV system from a company who actively said they dislike EVs?
You are buying a Stellantis product. It’s GOING to be a hunk of crap.
However that engine running as a steady state generator should last longer. Those engines never get stressed. They just gently hum along at low RPM. And most of your miles will be electric only. As long as the maintenance is kept up there should be few issues.
Crap engines and trannys. Here you have an engine that runs gently and rarely and no transmission. Greatest Chrysler product ever.