• HippoLover85@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Amd dc sales are taking off and intel is still struggling.

    Spr is not a competitive product for the vast majority of workloads. Its fine here because who cares about the cpu performance. Cloud probably paying premium for bergamo chips, and you dont need a powerful 128 core here.

    • GrandDemand@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This^

      SPR is cheaper than Genoa and Bergamo, and supply of those EPYC chips has not been as abundant as SPR.

      There’s advantages to SPR over Zen 4 EPYC in ML/AI workloads, and while MI300X will be doing the grunt of the training and inference, some model weights/parameters could be offloaded to the CPU with minimal performance loss in the event the VRAM buffer overflows to system memory. CPU only inference could also tested for model performance on weaker hardware or be utilized if all MI300X are busy and there’s unused CPU cycles (which is likely for these workloads). SPR generally outperforms Genoa in inference so there’s some merits for its selection over the latter.

      Regardless though this decision by Microsoft just boils down to cost and availability