I’m going to wait for the reviews, but the fact that the 5700X3D took a huge ding on the clocks, does not fill me with confidence.
That being said, if the TDP is 65 W and the 3D-cache saves the day, it would be a no-brainer for me (even though a 5800X3D would never hit 50 degrees in my two-rad custom loop).
IF the 5700x3D has 65w TDP (I know, I know that means 88watts) that would be pretty neat and an instant buy from me.
why not just get a 5800x3d and limit it manually? i cant imagine the 5700x3d will be that much cheaper anyway.
I’m not too keen on relying on PBO2-Tuner (software). And so far it has been next to impossible (work in progress) to find out if my motherboard actually supports curve optimizer for this specific CPU in bios.
I thought most motherboards support it by now. My asrock b450 at least does.
Probably yes. But if the 5700x3D is a 65w tdp part having a working curve optimizer is less paramount.
You can just lower PPT TDC EDC if nothing else, you’ll get better boost on a 5800x3d that way.
Curve optimizer is there to reduce heat and increase boost, but if you buy a 5700x3d you seem to lose a lot of boost, so even a shittily tuned 5800x3d should stay at 4.1ghz all core without much headache.
5700x3d kinda awkward. worse performance than 5600x3d due to clocks, but if you care about cores you can do normal 5700x.
It’ll keep up, the 5600x3d is rather consistently behind 5800x3d by 5-10% because of the fewer cores. 5600x3d is clearly ahead of a 5700x and 5800x by a decent deal over 10%, I think the 5700x3d will generally perform like a 5600x3d but with much more stable multitasking while gaming. Naturally, lends it definitely ahead of a 5700x in games. Maybe this is a 4.1 all core guarantee, where a few cores could boost higher?
The 5500x3d is what I wonder about, with a price like the 5600 has it’d be an incredible budget cpu, but the omission of two cores will make more sensitive as it deals with OS and other apps lending only three undisturbed. Eventually it’ll perform like a 5600 maybe even lower average but perhaps still more stable fps.
Kind of thinking the same thing but no idea on actual performance. I picked up the 5600x3d a few days ago just haven’t had time to build it, and that gets within a few percent of the 5800x3d performance in most titles. I’m thinking the lower clock speeds will play a big role in performance compared to cores.
I think they cancel each other out on average. Hopefully though some threads will be allowed to boost a little higher, or can be setup to do so.
I mean 5600x3d is only in microcenter so that rules out a huge portion of buyers. I’d almost have to choice but to buy the 5700x3d (assuming it’s available to me)
Hopefully with this launch comes an announcement of expanding the availability of the 5600X3D?
snagged it from microcenter about a week ago for $157. Upgraded from my 3700X and oh boy… Crazy value!
AMD trying to sell the trash bin again
Everything that didn’t make the top SKU is practically the trash bin