• serennow@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems to me like Newcastle deserve an apology - 5-0 saying Havertz should have been sent off is pretty damn clear cut.

    • meganev@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tell you what, we’re feeling generous. Don’t need an apology, will just keep the 3pts. They get sweeter by the minute .

    • Lifeis_not_fair@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      All the arsenal fans crying about “only 3-2 against Bruno” completely ignoring 5-0 against havertz, and absolutely perplexed that the thought that Bruno might not have done that if havertz was sent off.

      • Gargamir77@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I think Bruno foul is the only one that EVERYONE here agrees. Thats why it’s so ridiculous they don’t ”see” it as a no brainer red but see a more objective Havertz foul as one.

        • Lifeis_not_fair@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, the Bruno foul is the only one that everyone agrees on, because the Newcastle fans are reasonable and the arsenal fans are blind

      • Jhonnyskidmarks2003@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        LOL. Because anyone with 2 eyes can see that Bruno’s forearm smash on Jorginhos head is a far worse offense because he doesn’t have the intention to play the ball and he actually hit him with his forearm.

        Havertz on the other hand, although reckless, didn’t hit with the leading foot, he only clattered the NUFC player with the trailing leg.

        If Havertz connected with the studs up, then it’s a straight red.