• DinnerSmall4216@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How things could have been different if they signed Harry kane. Hoilund is going well but kane is a different animal.

    • vtzan@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think Kane would have drastically improved this Man U side. It would be like putting a Rolls Royce hood ornament on a beat up 1999 Toyota Corolla.

        • syncd86@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think Hojlund is the issue, he has looked good in champions league. I think he could be great in a better team

    • lastjedi23@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They got 0 midfield and -1 defense bro. Tf is the point of putting that much money on Kane? Doing such idiotic shopping is exactly why they’re rotting now. They could have used that casemiro money on 2 good young midfielders.

    • SwayzoMad@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had friends turning their nose up at Kane for 6 years because he has “no flair” but been stuck with martial, ighalo, weghorst and Hojland 🤣