With all of the Haaland vs Messi debate, would Haaland have been the first player to win the Ballon d’Or without having participated in the World Cup that year?
With all of the Haaland vs Messi debate, would Haaland have been the first player to win the Ballon d’Or without having participated in the World Cup that year?
The ballon dor is a joke of an award, it’s judged by journalists that have no more insight than the average fan.
So many players who should have won it haven’t, because it’s a popularity contest. If you ask Liverpool fans, they’ll scream about Nunez, who shows a great aggression but couldn’t finish a roast dinner. Man City fans, Haaland (who I thought should have won it, plus I’m not even a premier league side supporter). Untied don’t have a player worthy and neither do Chelsea. Barca have been terrible and Madrid haven’t got a player last season who deserves it. Pointless mentioning any of the other leagues because they’re so one sided, it shouldn’t be classed as competitive. It’s a blindsided, journalist ran fan vote.
To me this award means just as much as the JPT trophy. Mindless nonsense.