In a recent discussion amongst friends each of us had to mention who we thought was the worst and why, just looking for who the internet think is the worst out of the 3.

  • wayno503@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    Nobody can say the Gazers are bad owner, they have spent more on players than any other prem club

    • ToedCarrot@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Boehly has potential to be a good owner tbf, just needs someone to tell him what to do.

  • sockweasel1@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    This whole sub is just testament to how much opposition fans chat shite about Man United, without a single clue what they are talking about. Anyone but United get the Glazers treatment and they don’t exist anymore. It really is that simple

  • jerseyshorespurs@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    Levy is the best out of these, wouldn’t even call him proper for discussion considering where he has taken the club financially, operationally, and competitively.

    They haven’t won and that’s the reason for schtick……and his negotiating tactics.

  • ExplodingDogs82@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    My vote goes to Ashley - at least he had the decency to eventually sell up. …Hicks & Gillette were worse than these combined though. Evil swines

  • HankHippopopolous@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    Daniel Levy doesn’t even belong in this conversation. I get that he’s not universally popular because he refuses to splash the cash that fans want but he’s taken spurs from a mid table team to one of the bigger clubs in the world. They’re also very profitable.

    He’s built a stadium that’s one of the best in the world and he’s built a world class training complex. They’ve regularly reached the champions league and although that trophy is still elusive Spurs have at least reached the champions league final and a carabao cup final in recent years so they’ve been close.

    Spurs are in a way better place than they were before Levy’s tenure and that’s the sign of a good manager imo.

    I think the glazers are easily the worst. They’ve saddled the club with debt. Taken out millions for themselves and not invested a penny. The stadium is falling apart. The training facilities are ancient and the squad is a visionless mess. They spend money on players but it’s spent poorly. The club needs huge investment and the Glazers will never do it. They just want to get as much as they can out and screw the consequences. The club is in a much worse place than they found it.

  • crymore29@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    FSG are up there, don’t let Liverpool’s success fool you. Yes the model is outstanding.

    However sometimes you need to invest there and then. Waiting 3 years too late to rebuild our midfield cost us possibly 22/23. Not signing a decent CB in 20/21 in January while we were top of the league with long term injuries to our centre backs cost us the league as well

  • zahrdahl@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    Including Levy in this is beyond stupid. While not perfect hes closer to one of the best owners

  • nyamzdm77@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    11 months ago

    If the Glazers took over any other club bar maybe Arsenal and Liverpool they’d probably have gone bust by now. Utd’s revenue is so huge that the Glazers can suck out as much money as they want but the club will stay afloat. Very few other PL teams can afford them this luxury