• @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    He claimed he knew the money hadn’t been donated in 2021, so if that’s true, we’re looking at 2 years, not 10. He was an officer the whole time, but it’s very common for family run businesses and charities to name people as officers even when they don’t have an active role.

    My point is that it’s very possible that he didn’t know for the first 7-8 years, and later just followed the same script he’d been following. That’s still bad, especially since he didn’t get the money donated until called out, but not as bad as sitting on it for 10 years.

    The golf thing is the final smoking gun, and I’d very much like to hear his explanation of that before jumping to conclusions. It could very well be that one of his siblings is doing something shady there and he wasn’t involved. Until I have details, I’ll keep my finger pointed at the charity itself and not Jirard, though he is a prime suspect. I think it should absolutely be investigated by the authorities, who’ll have access to all of the account data and can provide proof of what happened.

    • @woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      He cannot claim and keep a straight face that he’s looking for charities when he speaks about a specific charity for years, be it 10 or 2.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        My point is that he could have just been evaluating charities for the past two years, and before that his siblings were supposed to take care of that. We don’t know what the internal agreements were, or the communication between him and the rest of the people in the foundation. All we know is that he claims he knew the money wasn’t donated in 2021, and that pushing on him last month got the money donated.

        None of this is particularly relevant to those who have donated, but it’s pretty important when looking at legal consequences and culpability. I think there’s enough here to say Jirard is a scumbag, but not enough to necessarily claim that he is a criminal, though there’s a good chance someone at the foundation has committed a crime.

        • @britishblaze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Even if he only he knew in 2021 he then continued to claim the money was being donated as recent as 2022. Which means he is either complicit or lying.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            I don’t think you can draw either conclusion confidently. Here’s an alternate explanation: his sister acknowledged that the money wasn’t donated, and told him that it would once they pick a charity, and he didn’t press on it until it got publicity. I haven’t reviewed every time he boosted his charity, but in the ones I did see, he said he “worked with charities X, Y, and Z,” not that they’ve actually donated money to them (i.e. they’ve been in talks about the donation process). I don’t know how likely that is, but it’s plausible enough for me to hold back on personal accusations, especially if I had a public platform like a popular YouTube channel (e.g. Mutahar @ someordinarygamers YT channel)

            The way I see it, he’s either complicit, lying, or negligent. I’m not going to guess which one until I see more evidence.