• danielton
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really? I always hated it. It was such a resource hog compared to Firefox, and that only got worse as Firefox improved.

    My main Linux distro at the time, Fedora, wouldn’t even ship Chromium because of how difficult and inefficient it was to package. It leaves a bunch of Google crap on Mac too.

    Was it better on Windows or something? Because it’s always been crap on Linux and Mac.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In 2008? Sure, chrome was lightning quick, especially with V8 on the JS side, granted this was on Mac. It was only a matter of time before it became google’s ad platform though

      • danielton
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe the Linux version was ahead of Mac and Windows in 2008. It was already crap then. lol

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m a JavaScript dev by trade. V8 was light years ahead when it came out, the specs on runtime compilation were off the charts. I’m not defending google by any means, but the work that went into V8 is how nodejs was created, and Firefox has adapted many of those learnings into its own JS engine. Google was and always has been a corporation for profit, but their engineers really pushed JS into a new stage with their engine, whether or not the browser around it was great