@starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 days agoAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devimagemessage-square346fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down133
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.dev@starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 days agomessage-square346fedilink
minus-square@pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink5•7 days agoLower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
minus-square@Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink10•edit-27 days agoI would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
minus-squareDoglinkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 days agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-square@pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•6 days agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
Lower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
I would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
To a certain point.