@renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 days agoBasically the extent of my IPv6 knowledgelemmy.worldimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1688arrow-down114file-textcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1674arrow-down1imageBasically the extent of my IPv6 knowledgelemmy.world@renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish • 9 days agomessage-square93fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
Template source: https://web.archive.org/web/20210304000634/https://www.government.nl/topics/coronavirus-covid-19/visiting-the-netherlands-from-abroad/checklist
minus-square@hank_and_deans@lemmy.calinkfedilink1•8 days agoYeah, no. If remote hosts could not send traffic to hosts behind NAT almost nothing would work. The hacks employed to make NAT work make security worse, not better.
minus-square@AceBonobo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•edit-28 days agoYou’re talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though? Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs
Yeah, no. If remote hosts could not send traffic to hosts behind NAT almost nothing would work.
The hacks employed to make NAT work make security worse, not better.
You’re talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?
Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs