

Correct. 2/3 of the Senate present required to remove.
At least it’s a start. His boss is ultimately responsible, but it’s better than nothing if they succeed.


Correct. 2/3 of the Senate present required to remove.
At least it’s a start. His boss is ultimately responsible, but it’s better than nothing if they succeed.


Hey, now there’s something beyond speculation. So it was true. I don’t apologize for my original skepticism with the info at the time. I am willing to be swayed with additional info and in this case confirmation from the horses mouth.
Thanks for posting that!


Lol, how rude. I’m not the one defending a media organization proudly funded by oligarch money, dressed up real nice in tax exempt foundations.


It’s also entirely possible I just have unique, nuanced opinions that don’t completely align with yours. If this article is true, add it to the pile of things that family should be run out of town for. Better yet, impeach, convict, remove from office, and go after the rest of that corrupt family enterprise based on mountains of evidence that supports that end. I just am not ready to swallow this news story as-is simply because it supports that narrative. Guess that makes me a bad person.
Lock me up. 😒


I can also argue with an Internet rando for leveling baseless belief. Propublica may be legit, but they’re not showing the receipts on this one that connects the dots. Propublica is the platform, these 4 reporters don’t earn any credibility with this kind of reporting. Propublica should demand better.
Not saying reveal the 3 individuals, yes, they’d surely have the regime’s sights set on them, but contracts, receipts, accounting leaks can be shown, shit gets hacked and dumped all the time. Deniability as to where it came from, but when they have it, they can validate it with additional sources, company documents, other experts, etc. All we get here is, ‘trust us’. Produce some documentation.
There’s plenty of out in the open corruption to light this administration up for. Surely there are other more obscure stories of corruption with better sourcing than this. They show photos of the couple watching fireworks reportedly funded by the guy, but not a receipt to support that claim?

Simple, that’s their sugar daddy.
https://media.npr.org/documents/about/annualreports/NPR Annual Report 2025 mobile.pdf
Corporate sponsors starting on page 59, some other notable names starting on on page 38.
Other clues spread throughout, as to who they have to please to stay funded, and in business.


…“according to records reviewed by ProPublica and interviews with three people familiar with the event”…
Show the records, at the very least. Provide the evidence for your audience, if you respect their intellect and ability to draw the same conclusion. Otherwise, just more nonsense posted by ProPublica with sourcing to “people familiar with the matter”. Laughable. The article is pure speculation made out to be something more.
Until then, Hitchens’ razor applies. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.


In the US, that’s what the 2 major parties are for. Each blames foreign influence for the extremes of the opposition (within or out of the actual party). Articles just parroting some in-power government agency’s assertion are clearly just carrying water for the power structure they thrive in and support. No questioning, no demanding those claims be backed up by any evidence. By the time actual journalists dig into whatever was used to support the claim (if it exists at all), it ends up being the most benign nonsense that could hardly be called a coordinated campaign by external actors. By then, enough people just see the headlines and believe it on the surface because it aligns with the us vs them narrative. It serves the powerful in my country to claim there’s some external enemy rather than give the masses any room to realize that power structure serves big business interests and the disagreements are largely for show.
You and belluck have a point, they want to keep people with similar interests divided rather than work on solutions. It’s just far more likely that coordinated divide and conquer campaign is coming from inside the country than outside.


Right… The only reason citizens in any country are upset is because of influence by an external entity.
Sure. Can’t be any other explanation. No valid concerns. Got it.
The power structure works to protect the power structure. No way this warning is the disinformation?


I’m doing my part!


They weren’t building those ‘detention centers’ for the immigrants. That’s a convenient cover until they’ve captured every lever of power. Within reach, or they’ll make it so before or when elections don’t go their way, if those still matter. Dissent is terror.


AOC? Nah, she’s been made to heel to Nancy’s and Hakeem’s wishes. Buckled at pretty much the first opportunity too. Still says some nice things, but she’s useless as a challenge to the status quo. Made a useful tool of the establishment.
Bernie? Well, he tucked tail and quit fighting after the party establishment colluded and sabotaged his campaigns. 2020 was especially egregious, and he still agreed to back Biden. Again, says the right things at times, but far less a real challenge to the status quo now than he ever was.
The others you mentioned? Mamdani can be a good pragmatic example, wish him the best, but he’s limited to the Senate at the federal level if he aspires to higher office. El-Sayed, too early to tell. Talarico, I assume you mean? Tough row to hoe for a few months, probably a long shot, but he’s been a democrat for years. That party is really irredeemable.
I wish I knew the real solution to this electoral mess. I keep hoping for a really hard charging third party challenge that can bridge the divide. May wait my entire life at this point.
Setting aside how shitty this all is for the global populace, it’s a hell of way to completely withdraw the US from the middle east (or whatever the preferred name for the region is currently). All US bases decimated, including 5th Fleet saying they are not getting back to their main base in Bahrain anytime soon.
It’s wasteful, deadly, and beyond stupid, but ending (maybe) US military presence in the region as the end product? That’s wild, and a welcome outcome. If only.