I absolutely agree with you there. I have a long list of people I prefer. Newsome is in my mind is the choice one step above a republican, and that’s just barely.

I hope we get someone decent through the primary. I detest our system, but until it changes the most moral thing I can do is pick harm reduction. I don’t want to see anyone stripped of their rights. However, I also don’t want to see anyone shipped off to death camps.

I can fight to restore rights to people, I can’t fight to resurrect the dead.

Honestly after typing all this out revolution seems like the preferable thing at this point, but until then all I can do is pick harm reduction at the ballot box and fight for more.

One side isn’t supporting me and voted for some things that are harmful for me. The other side wants to put me in an extermination camp.

I can’t decide these are the same

So main issue with this comment is the UK system allows for more than 2 choices.

Also some people no matter how intelligent just can’t fully grasp a new language. They can become functionally fluent but never academically perfect

You can spend 200 years listening to a language, but if you don’t try to understand it you never will

My city owns all our utilities. Works the same, arguably more reliable

This isn’t a choice issue. It should be state owned and operated in a non-profit capacity, and everyone should pay their fair share.

Correct. So that means the incentive would obviously be placed on higher value crops and not necessarily staple crops like rice.

That’s a big problem for a nation’s food security

If we don’t invent some insane technology in the next 10 years there’s pretty much nothing we can do.

Best case enough people die, environmental impacts decrease, and the climate stabilizes.

Worse case we become another Venus.

Makes a lot of sense to try and preserve the remaining 40% then

Huge news for diabetes, but I’m more excited about the potential applications this type of treatment has. So many possibilities

Children Combatants in Iraq

There now it’s legal

At the cost of their domestic food security.

Did we not learn from the pandemic?

Back at the office:

So it seems people don’t like ads on their vibrator which means they are viewing them. Let’s wait a couple of years for the anger to die down then do it again.

I believe you misread, they said a high number of males with evidence of trauma. Basically a very large percentage of male skeletons showed damage. The original comment didn’t say there were no female skeletons.

Also depending on the dig site mass graves of men killed in combat are common. Those would obviously lack women.

I wouldn’t say genocided per se. We have pretty significant percentages of non-homo sapien DNA. Which implies a decently high degree of inter-breeding.

My money is on a combination of inter-breeding leading to genetic extinction through dilution, resource competition (strained by changing environmental conditions), and of course inter-group conflict.

Hole

And typically unenforceable.

Sorry US law, that’s where the US can do whatever it wants in the rest of the world but at home there is a rule book (allegedly)

The effect is still the same these companies are given access to my personal information because the government wants to monitor our activity online