Fuck you Kelly Ayotte

Lol to telling someone who’s playing acoustic that a clean tone is boring

I’d love to have a music theory comm. Like discussing some passages and analyzing things beyond the basics

This isn’t a real book cover. You can tell because it’s supposed to say Berenstein bears

Definitely let it go straight. Donny already has so little time left that taking out the other 3 would be much more productive

I’m already subbed to a few comms but I’d take recommendations on what I should be following

So did you find any good termites to purchase?

Jumping back here to say that

we need to ALWAYS remember the sheer depravity other human beings are capable of.

Is the only thing I’m saying

Except I’m not. My scope has been very limited to the dehumanization aspect. But otherwise I’m done with you arguing in bad faith

My point is less about what rights they might deserve, and more about staying informed and vigilant of the ideological capacities of human beings, including yourself.

This entire conversation is on a post about the death of a nazi. “the horrible ideology took a loss” sure sounds like “the horrible ideology” of nazism “took a loss” of the death of one of their own.

To go back to the point I was making in that comment, where did I say anything about celebration?

deleted by creator

You need to work on your reading comprehension. I have said absolutely nothing about whether or not to celebrate the death of a nazi, neither does the paradox of tolerance.

I’m not trying to defend them. I’m trying to point out that you’re not defending yourself from that idea. In a world where all the nazis have been genocided, that is a world that accepts genocide as a reasonable solution. That world will commit another genocide and sooner than you might think. Especially when you consider that it didn’t start with nazism. There were confederates before them and there are zionists after them. If you accept one genocide then any other just has to find the right justifications. Recognizing human susceptibility to that idea is the first step in protecting yourself from it. If we fail to do so, the cycle will never end.

You’re arguing against things I did not say nor imply. I have made no argument here against self defense nor for civility.

I am abiding the paradox of tolerance by not tolerating dehumanizing rhetoric. Because I believe that rhetoric enables fascism.

The ability to strip away the title of “human being” is exactly what they are arguing for. You just have different criteria.

I’m not saying you have to treat them with kindness. I am saying you have to reckon with the fact that they are still human. Or you will be doomed to follow the same path.

I believe I called them fuckheads so I don’t seem to have a problem with ridicule. My point of contention is in the reply tweet of “no human being was harmed”. I’m not trying to defend the thoughts or actions of these people, I’m just saying we have to recognize that they are people. I propose building a better world, proving those ideas wrong, and defending ourselves when necessary.