• ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      While still flawed and ultimately pale in comparison to socialism, his economic vision was still light years better then the utter dystopian hell we have entered.

  • trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    Competition is key. If they work together, it’s to the detriment of all.

    The problem of capitalism is that managing the competition becomes too complicated. Additionally, competition leads to price distortions. That can also become problematic.

    The beauty of capitalism is that it rewards cooperation which makes it ugly because the lack thereof shows our deepest rifts.

        • trailing9@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          37
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, that’s why it becomes complicated. Monopolies can be taxed to create space for competition but who prevents the authorities from being corrupted?

          So better create something without competition. But humanity hasn’t settled on a system. Meanwhile, competition has to be managed.

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This isn’t complicated this is one of the most simple and most visible mechanism in capitalism. Even Keynes seen that, just his answer was unfeasible for a prolonged periods.

            • trailing9@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              The mechanism is simple. But how do you prevent the ones who regulate it from being corrupted?

              I have to admit that I don’t know Keynes’ answer. If you don’t mind, could you give me some keywords for a search, please?

              • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                But how do you prevent the ones who regulate it from being corrupted?

                By setting up a system that don’t promote corruption nor require it, unlike capitalism which do.

                Keynes answer was to make state regulate the above features of capitalism, but Keynes either from ignorance (hard to believe) or rather from utter idealism, ignored Marx and Smith analysis and warnings and put the regulation of capitalism in the hands of capitalist state. In effect, he tasked regulating those nastiest of men from OP quote to the very same men.

                Recommended read: Lenin’s “Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism”

                • trailing9@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I really have to read it. But I don’t question that the state will be corrupted. My question is how that non-corruptive system can be created. That’s the tricky part.

            • trailing9@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hasn’t Marx only provided the analysis? The Sovjet Union would have survived if everything is settled.

              • Farvana@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t know of many nations that would survive the unrelenting assault of a burgeoning superpower for 8 decades.

                • trailing9@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  21
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I like to think that the SU collapsed from a grain deficit. That’s primarily an internal problem.

                  But that’s a side-argument. Where can I find the blueprint for a working non-competitive organization?