Hilarious that all the liberal and socdems in the replies are saying “That’s taken out of context, read the next line he wrote!” It is they who are missing the FULL context. True, the next line says he would kill Hitler if he had the chance, but in that very same sentence he admits it would not be because he actually disliked the man. After this, he reiterates that Hitler was very appealing. The true context is that he materially opposed Hitler but he still liked him as a person. Orwell stans are the ones cherry picking to support that useful idiot
Could the opinions toward Hitler be of any indication of a person’s criminal tendency unless it is about the opinions of people who did not know that Hitler was simply copying the war crimes of other Western European imperialists? Hitler had get the slave camps of the so-called ‘Indian Residential Schools’ in USA and Canada for his atrocities in the Holocaust, but many people who condemn Hitler did not condemn the governments and Christian churches of the Western European emigrants for their war crimes in the fake schools.
Also, when did the Liberals ever care about the context? The Liberals always provide fake context to confuse people like their assumption that Karl Marx is using the American redefinition of dictatorship that only existed after his death.
A racist, a snitch, a rapist, and a plagiarist walk into a bar. The bartender says “how’s the new book coming along, Mr Orwell?”
for comrades who don’t want to go to Twitter to see what it is;
Anti-Communist goes hand-to hand with Nazism. Imagine my shock
