Tests show it’s just too hard to put the unused 240/4 block to work

  • 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    While Linux can happily handle that zone as a source of or destination for traffic, most networking equipment deliberately doesn’t recognize its existence – and those boxes can’t easily be upgraded.

    • ruffsl@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Any particular reason that those OEMs made that decision when releasing those boxes? Was that range blacklisted in firmware because of the legacy specification? I thought the spec just forebode range’s public allocation, but not necessarily its internal use.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think that’s what it means: that firmware respects the spect and doesn’t route that range – I doubt you wouldn’t be able to use it on your LAN.